Confusion about model names abounds in vintage beefcake photos. Understandably, gay men in general often adopted an alias for homosexual contacts in those troubled times to avoid blackmail and exposure. Bodybuilders who used their real names for formal competitions often adopted pseudonyms for the slightly less respectable beefcake studios and even used different names for different studios. Royale's models may also have adopted professional model names to disguise their identities as servicemen.
However, Royale Studio seems to have had more than it's fair share of confusion. They seem to have had a habit of mis-naming models particularly in dealings with beefcake publications. It's not clear if this stemmed from a degree of casualness, disorganisation or lack of professionalism or was a genuine device to protect the models.
There is some evidence that Royale staff regarded correct naming as unimportant. The convoluted use of names in the Navy Romeo group of photo-sets is a good example and there's a testy underlining of the name Trefor in the catalogue description of ERTR-3, after spelling it as Trevor in ERTR-2. However, Royale also had a (queenly) habit of making a joke of names, cannibalising those of celebrities or misspelling model's proper names to create an innuendo. 'Ted' seems to crop up as a catch-all substitute for a model's proper name.
Simple Mistakes
![]() |
| Tibor Urgay and Brian Lamprill in 'Gym', April 1960 |
The caption printed at the top of this photo contains two spectacular examples of misnaming. I relate elsewhere at this blog the confusion of Tibor Urgay's identity with the US Model Ray Andersen, which was because they looked very alike. This mistake was probably created by the US magazine rather than Royale, which would suggest they didn't supply any names with the photo.
Brian Lamprill was inexplicably given the name of a completely different British model, Gerry Haywood (not Gerri!).
By the way, I love the idea that this image (actually from the Urgay v Lamprill set) was an impromptu session created by models 'waiting assignment'.
Deliberate Innuendo
![]() |
| Vim Nov 1960 |
Poor Brian Lamprill was also tagged as Brian Lamphrille in Vim later the same year. This hardly seems like a simple mistake, a typo or misspelling. It's as if some wag deliberately turned the name into a suggestive pun. (Say it out loud if you don't get it!). It probably wasn't Vim's doing, they took themselves very seriously as a body building periodical. In fact, Royale seemed to make a regular practice of giving models 'joke' names.
Lamprill was primarily a 'straight' body builder for Royale and able to use his real name (or at least his competition name) but Royale often using serving members of the armed forces for their racy, uniformed storyettes and they may have adopted false names
![]() |
| The Cast of 'Navy Gash' |
![]() |
| Peter George as 'Harold Andsbury' in Gym 3, Jun 59 |
Gym Magazine were also complicit in dubbing Peter George as 'Harold Andsbury' in this feature. Abbreviating Harold to 'H' produces the name H.Ands-bury, highly suggestive of FF fetish. Coining sobriquets like this for other people was a popular pastime for certain gay men in those days and some were very good at it. It's more likely a jest about Peter's memorable backside rather than titillating information about his sex life.
Non English Names
Celebrity Substitution
Private Jokes?
![]() |
| Stan Free giving a caning to a youth in' TEDS' |
Stan Free was called 'Barry Cutts' in the Royale Catalogue listing of 'TEDS' but I've not found that name used anywhere else and I can't decode the reference. It may be his real name, but I've speculated that this is private joke in his Solo Sets Post .
Frank Harrod's name in 'The Hold Up' may have been an joking allusion to the famous, up-market store. There's no trace of him beyond this appearance, but he bears a striking resemblance to David Tompkins, who also had a career as a fashion model, hence the joke.
%20royale.jpg)



%20Gym1%233%20Jun59%20z030m006%20%20tied%20bondage.jpg)



No comments:
Post a Comment